HTMinL is a CLI tool for x86-64 Linux machines that simplifies the task of minifying HTML in-place for production environments.
This software is a work-in-progress.
Feel free to use it, but if something weird happens — or if you have ideas for improvement — please open an issue!
HTMinL is a fast, in-place HTML minifier. It prioritizes safety and code sanity over ULTIMATE COMPRESSION, so may not save quite as many bytes as Node's venerable html-minifier, but it is also much less likely to break shit.
And it runs magnitudes faster…
Unlike virtually every other minifier in the wild, HTMinL is not a stream processor; it constructs a complete DOM tree from the full source before getting down to business. This allows for much more accurate processing and robust error recovery.
See the minification section for more details about the process, as well as the cautions section for important assumptions, requirements, gotchas, etc.
Debian and Ubuntu users can grab the pre-built
.deb package from the release page.
This application is written in Rust and can alternatively be built from source using Cargo:
# Clone the source. git clone https://github.com/Blobfolio/htminl.git # Go to it. cd htminl # Build as usual. Specify additional flags as desired. cargo build \ --bin htminl \ --release
(This should work under other 64-bit Unix environments too, like MacOS.)
It's easy. Just run
htminl [FLAGS] [OPTIONS] <PATH(S)>….
The following flags and options are available:
-h, --help Prints help information -l, --list <list> Read file paths from this list. -p, --progress Show progress bar while minifying. -V, --version Prints version information
Paths can be specified as trailing command arguments, and/or loaded via text file (with one path per line) with the
-l option. Directories are scanned recursively for
Some quick examples:
# Minify one file. htminl /path/to/index.html # Tackle a whole folder at once with a nice progress bar: htminl -p /path/to/html # Or load it up with a lot of places separately: htminl /path/to/html /path/to/index.html …
Minification is primarily achieved through (conservative) whitespace manipulation — trimming, collapsing, or both — in text nodes, tags, and attribute values, but only when it is judged completely safe to do so.
For example, whitespace is not altered in "value" attributes or inside elements like
<textarea>, where it generally matters.
Speaking of "generally matters",
HTMinL does not make any assumptions about the display type of elements, as CSS is a Thing. Just because a
<div> is normally block doesn't mean someone hasn't styled one to render inline. This often leaves some whitespace around tags, but helps ensure styled layouts display correctly.
Additional savings are achieved by stripping:
- HTML Comments;
- XML processing instructions;
- Child text nodes of
<head>elements (they don't belong there!);
- Leading and trailing whitespace directly in the
- Whitespace in inline CSS is collapsed and trimmed (but otherwise unaltered);
- Whitespace sandwhiched between non-renderable elements like
- Pointless attributes (like an empty "id" or "alt" or a falsey boolean like
- Empty or implied attribute values;
- Leading and trailing whitespace in non-value attributes;
The above list is non-exhaustive, but hopefully you get the idea!
While care has been taken to balance savings and safety, there are a few design choices that could potentially break documents, worth noting before you use it on your project:
- Documents are expected to be encoded in UTF-8. Other encodings might be OK, but some text could get garbled.
- Documents are processed as HTML, not XML or XHTML. Inline SVG elements should be fine, but it may well corrupt other XML-ish data.
- Child text nodes of
<head>elements are removed. Text doesn't belong there anyway, but HTML is awfully forgiving; who knows what kinds of markup will be found in the wild!
- CSS whitespace is trimmed and collapsed, which could break (very unlikely!) selectors like
- Element tags are normalized, which can break fussy
camelCaseCustomElements. (Best to write tags like
These benchmarks were performed on a Intel® Core™ i7-10610U with four discrete cores, averaging 100 runs. To best approximate feature parity, html-minifier was run with the following flags:
--collapse-boolean-attributes --collapse-whitespace --decode-entities --remove-attribute-quotes --remove-comments --remove-empty-attributes --remove-optional-tags --remove-optional-tags --remove-redundant-attributes --remove-redundant-attributes --remove-script-type-attributes --remove-style-link-type-attributes
In terms of size reduction, html-minifier is slightly better, shaving off an extra 1-4%.
But in terms of execution time, HTMinL is hundreds of times faster.
It is important to note that
html-minifier is not designed for this particular use case — recursive in-place HTML minification with random non-HTML assets sprinkled about — which goes a long way toward explaining the gross difference in runtime cost.
The per-file entry attempts to correct for this by averaging the times of each individual file, but even there, HTMinL is about forty times faster.
Not too shabby!